1Department of General Surgery, The Second People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, China.
2Institute of Clinical Oncology, The Second People’s Hospital (Cancer Hospital of Lianyungang), Lianyungang, China.
#Equal Contribution.
*Corresponding Author : Xuzhu Gao; Yongchang Miao; Gang Wang
Institute of Clinical Oncology, The Second People’s Hospital of Lianyungang City (Cancer Hospital of Lianyungang), Lianyungang, China.
Tel: +86-19951881226;
Email: alexgwan@163.com;
lygeymyc@163.com; whiteching@foxmail.com
Received : Jul 16, 2024
Accepted : Aug 12, 2024
Published : Aug 19, 2024
Archived : www.jjgastro.com
Copyright : © Gao X; Miao Y; Wang G (2024).
Background: To analyze the occurrence and clinical features of hiatal hernias following laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for cardia cancer, and discuss potential causes and methods of prevention and treatment.
Methods: This retrospective study examined a case involving a patient who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for cardia cancer at the Second People’s Hospital of Lianyungang.
Results: The patient underwent a laparoscopic procedure for small bowel reduction and esophageal hiatus hernia repair, subsequently recovering smoothly and being discharged in a cured state.
Conclusion: Hiatal hernia is a rare complication following surgery for cardia cancer. Adequate preoperative respiratory preparations should be made to facilitate effective expectoration, improve the patient’s nutritional status to mitigate tissue edema, and minimize damage to the diaphragmatic pillars during surgery, choosing an appropriate method of anastomosis. Once a postoperative hiatal hernia is diagnosed, early surgical intervention is recommended, with laparoscopic surgery being a safe and effective approach.
Keywords: Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; Total gastrectomy; Postoperative hiatal hernia.
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. According to the latest global cancer burden data released by the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization in 2020, gastric cancer is the fifth most prevalent malignant tumor worldwide, with approximately 1.09 million new cases and ranking fourth in mortality among cancers, resulting in 770,000 deaths [1,2]. Although the standardized incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer have been declining in most countries and regions around the world in recent years, they remain relatively high in China [3].
Currently, the main treatment modality is surgery combined with perioperative radio chemotherapy [4]. Historically, clinicians preferred conventional open gastrectomy, but with advances in laparoscopic equipment, surgical techniques, and the experience of surgeons in laparoscopic procedures, Laparoscopic Gastrectomy (LG) has been widely accepted for the treatment of gastric cancer. It is minimally invasive, cosmetically favorable, and allows for quicker recovery, offering similar oncological outcomes to traditional Open Gastrectomy (OG). Moreover, compared to OG, LG tends to have a lower rate of postoperative adhesions due to less manipulation [5-7]. In recent years, various types of total LG with intracorporeal anastomosis have flourished and have become one of the standard surgical approaches for proximal gastric cancer. However, the advancement of technology can also bring potential pitfalls. Reports suggest that LG may increase the risk of internal hernias compared to OG, especially after total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction [8], which is prone to complications such as mesenteric hernias and Petersen’s hernias [9]. In particular, hiatal hernia following laparoscopic total gastrectomy is a rare complication with few reports to date [10]. Because a hiatal hernia involves the herniation of abdominal contents through a diaphragmatic defect into the thoracic cavity, it can significantly affect the patient’s intestinal and cardiopulmonary function. Delayed surgery can lead to complications such as intestinal incarceration, stricture, and necrosis, which can be life-threatening in severe cases. Thus, hiatal hernia after total gastrectomy is a potential complication that warrants clinical attention. Timely recognition and diagnosis, followed by the best treatment approach, are crucial.
In this study, we retrospectively analyzed a case of hiatal hernia following surgery for cardia cancer in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery at the Second People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, aiming to assess the incidence, clinical features, and summarize the causes and prevention methods of hiatal hernia after laparoscopic total gastrectomy.
The patient, a 71-year-old male with a BMI of 23.4 kg/m2, underwent a gastroscopy on March 9, 2023, which revealed a cardia mass. Pathology confirmed adenocarcinoma. Preoperative thoracoabdominal Computed Tomography (CT) showed intact bilateral pleura without thickening, no pleural effusion, and an intact diaphragm (Figures 1A & 1B). On March 6, 2023, he underwent a laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy, D2 lymph node dissection, and esophagojejunostomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction at our hospital. Histopathology revealed moderately to poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma G3, with tumor staging of ypT3, ypN0 (0/22), L0, V0, R0, cM0. On postoperative day 17, a follow-up thoracoabdominal CT showed localized thickening of the bilateral pleura, a small amount of right pleural effusion, and the esophagojejunostomy located within the thoracic cavity (Figures 1C & 1D). The patient was discharged cured and received adjuvant chemotherapy thereafter.
Ten months postoperatively, the patient presented to the emergency department on January 25, 2024, with “abdominal pain for 2 days, worsening for half a day,” characterized by continuous dull pain in the upper abdomen, alleviated when sitting or bending forward and severe when lying flat. He denied any history of vomiting or respiratory difficulty. Physical examination showed normal vital signs, severe tenderness in the right upper and upper abdomen, and normal bowel sounds. Initial laboratory results, including cardiac enzymes and electrocardiogram, showed no abnormalities. A thoracoabdominal CT scan indicated the esophagojejunostomy and dilated jejunal loops herniated through the hiatal hernia into the right hemithorax, forming a right-sided hiatal hernia (Figures 2A & 2B). There was no free fluid or air in the thoracic cavity.
Subsequently, we performed an emergency exploratory laparotomy. During surgery, the small intestine was observed herniating into the thoracic cavity through the hiatal hernia (Figure 3A), with no evidence of local recurrence, peritoneal disease, or liver metastasis. The small intestine was repositioned, showing no evident signs of ischemic necrosis, and a defect at the diaphragmatic angle was observed (Figure 3B). Notably, upon extending through the hiatus into the thoracic cavity, no pleura was observed (Figure 3C). We decided to perform hernia repair surgery and secured the intestine to the hiatus (Figure 3D). A drainage tube was placed behind the esophagojejunostomy site during the surgery. The nasogastric tube was removed on the same day postoperatively, and the patient began passing gas and consuming liquids two days later. The patient was discharged cured five days after surgery. At a three-month follow-up, the patient reported no abdominal discomfort.
Postoperative Hiatal Hernia is defined as a condition in which abdominal organs (mainly the stomach) herniate through the esophageal hiatus into the thoracic cavity, making it the most common type of diaphragmatic hernia, accounting for over 90% [11]. This condition usually occurs in the early postoperative period, with complex hiatal hernias potentially developing within the first year after surgery but also observed up to five years postoperatively [12]. Generally, the later the symptoms of a postoperative hiatal hernia appear, the milder the condition. Patients often present with abdominal pain, which may manifest as symptoms of partial gastrointestinal obstruction, such as constipation, bloating, and significantly reduced flatulence. Some patients may also exhibit symptoms of chest tightness, shortness of breath, and cardiac insufficiency.
Early diagnosis of complex hiatal hernias after gastrectomy is often challenging due to the lack of specific symptoms. Therefore, in patients presenting with abdominal pain and partial obstruction symptoms following total gastrectomy, a high suspicion and appropriate imaging diagnosis are warranted. A chest X-ray may show bowel loops and fluid levels within the thoracic cavity. A chest CT scan can clearly display the shadow of gastrointestinal organs above the diaphragm, and barium enema can be used to confirm the diagnosis of a hiatal hernia [13].
Currently, the management of asymptomatic hiatal hernias after gastrectomy remains controversial. While small or sliding hernias can be monitored, any increase in hernia size or onset of symptoms necessitates surgical intervention [14]. Symptomatic hiatal hernias require emergency surgical treatment upon diagnosis to avoid risks of intestinal incarceration and strangulation [15]. In this study, the patient’s Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC) was grade III, and emergency exploratory laparotomy was performed upon diagnosis. The small intestine was found to be in good condition and was repositioned, and the diaphragm was repaired. For most hiatal hernia patients, simple hernia repair suffices, but for patients with fibrotic defects in the hiatus, mesh repair is a better option. In most cases, laparoscopic surgery is preferred; however, if the patient is in sepsis or has significant intestinal adhesions, open surgery may be chosen. In cases of severe thoracic adhesions preventing the return of herniated contents to the abdominal cavity, a thoracic approach should also be prepared [16,17].
Studies indicate that factors such as the patient’s BMI, increased intra-abdominal pressure from various postoperative causes, pre-existing hiatal hernias, transhiatal dissection, and minimally invasive approaches are risk factors [18]. The incidence of hiatal hernia within three years after gastrectomy is 0.19%, with a significantly higher incidence following laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy compared to open gastrectomy (0.53% vs. 0.15%, p=0.03) [19]. Some studies suggest that reduced intra-abdominal adhesions and increased hiatus defects post-minimally invasive procedures are associated with higher rates of hiatal hernias [20,21]. However, multivariate analyses have not confirmed minimally invasive approaches as independent predictors of hiatal hernia [13]. Therefore, whether minimally invasive approaches increase the risk of hiatal hernia requires further study.
In this study, localized thickening of the pleura was observed post-gastrectomy, likely due to surgical trauma. Pleural injury implies that the negative pressure in the thoracic cavity more easily affects abdominal organs. With coughing or changes in posture increasing intra-abdominal pressure, the likelihood of hiatal hernia occurrence is heightened. However, no literature reports have confirmed that pleural injury leads to postoperative hiatal hernia, and current data are insufficient to support this hypothesis, necessitating more samples and well-designed studies for confirmation.
Chung et al.’s study of 490 total gastrectomy patients, including 365 functional and 125 overlapping esophagojejunostomies, reported eight cases (1.63%) of hiatal hernias occurring on average 7.3 months postoperatively (range: 3.4 to 12.8 months), all following functional anastomoses [22]. Functional anastomoses require longer esophageal and jejunal segments, whereas the overlap method does not. However, due to the low complication rate, the impact of anastomosis type on hiatal hernia rates lacks statistical significance, requiring further follow-up and research to confirm any superiority of the overlap method. Another recent study suggests increased incidence due to improved survival rates following neoadjuvant therapy [23].
Postoperatively, normal anatomical structures around the hiatus may be altered due to surgical manipulation, causing inadvertent muscle fiber damage. Thus, avoiding unnecessary diaphragmatic splits is crucial, necessitating further refinement of surgical techniques, such as using the overlap method and linear staplers for intracorporeal anastomosis to prevent or reduce hiatal hernia-related complications [22]. Literature suggests that initial closure of the esophageal hiatus and mesh placement during the first surgery can prevent hiatal hernia recurrence. However, these solutions have problems, as initial suturing did not reduce hernia risk, with two out of seven hiatal hernias recurring despite initial closure [24]. Some researchers propose colonic fixation to the abdominal wall to prevent potential hiatal hernia, given that 82.22% of hiatal hernias involve transverse colon herniation, with small intestine and gastric wall herniation at 13.33% and 4.44%, respectively [25]. Other measures include maintaining smooth bowel movements postoperatively, preventing coughing to maintain a stable low thoracoabdominal pressure differential, and adhering to a healthy diet to maintain a reasonable BMI to reduce postoperative hiatal hernia incidence.
Due to the low incidence of hiatal hernia after total gastrectomy, single-center studies often lack sufficient sample sizes. Existing reports are often multicenter meta-analyses with significant variability and data heterogeneity. Effective prevention strategies require large-sample, homogeneous data studies.
In conclusion, hiatal hernia after laparoscopic total gastrectomy is a rare but potentially fatal complication. Patients typically present with symptoms of partial intestinal obstruction. For highly suspected cases, immediate thoracoabdominal CT scans are recommended. Symptomatic confirmed hiatal hernias require emergency intestinal repositioning and hernia repair to prevent intestinal necrosis. Avoiding crus muscle damage, using overlap anastomosis, and colonic fixation may reduce the incidence of postoperative hiatal hernias.
Author contribution: Collection of clinical data and writing: Dalai Xu, Lei Qiu and Feng Lu. Final approval of the manuscript: Gang Wang,Yongchang Miao and Xuzhu Gao.
Funding: This work was supported by Lianyungang association for science and technology, award number: ZD202308.
Ethical approval: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.