Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Hazrat-e-Rasool General Hospital, University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.
*Corresponding Author : Amirhosein Gholamlou
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Hazrat-e-Rasool General Hospital, University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Tel: +989107805789;
Email: amirgholamlou@gmail.com
Received : Jul 07, 2024
Accepted : Aug 01, 2024
Published : Aug 08, 2024
Archived : www.jjgastro.com
Copyright : © Gholamlou A (2024).
The Heimlich Maneuver (HM) is one of the main techniques approved by the American Red Cross and the American Heart Association, which has saved the lives of many choking victims. However, several studies have shown that this maneuver is associated with serious complications such as abdominal aortic thrombosis, Gastric and Esophageal rupture. In this study we report an 83-year-old female patient with a history of dysphagia on whom the HM was performed for witnessed aspiration by a family member during lunch. We also review the available reports of HM complications from inception to 2024 and discuss some other reported solutions that could be used instead of this maneuver to reduce its complications.
Keywords: Heimlich maneuver; Abdominal thrust; Aortic aneurysm thrombosis; Case report; Gastric rupture.
Heimlich Maneuver (HM) or abdominal thrust is one of the most common therapies used by physicians, nurses, and even the public, which is performed in acute upper airway obstruction. This technique is used among children and adults with eating disorders [1,2] or in case of choking on a substance, and in many of these cases, it has decreased mortality. But since 1975, when this method was described by Heimlich and accepted by the American Heart Association and American Red Cross (ARC) [3], significant reports have shown that HM can have serious complications such as Pneumothorax, Abdominal aortic thrombosis, Gastric or Pancreatic rupture, etc. that has led to the death of some cases. Here we report an 83-year-old female patient with a history of dysphagia on whom the HM was performed for witnessed aspiration by a family member during lunch. We also take this opportunity to review the available reports of HM complications from inception to 2024 represent them in a Table and discuss the other reported solutions that could be used instead of this maneuver to reduce its complications.
A literature search in PubMed was conducted based on “Heimlich maneuver”, and “case reports” as keywords, which showed 64 case reports from 1975 to 1.1.2024. Finally, by investigating and adding relevant references from some review studies, 46 considerable cases were documented in the Table.
An 83-year-old female patient developed dyspnea after choking on her food. Her grandson, who was a physician performed HM on her and it successfully dislodged the airway obstruction. She did not develop any evidence of confusion but for further assessments was transported to the emergency room of our hospital. On arrival, the patient’s vital signs were stable, and she had no history of previous illnesses except long-standing dysphagia and epigastric pain on swallowing. Because she complained of shortness of breath, computed tomography was obtained (Figure 1), and it revealed a mild reticular change at the bases of the lungs and a large aneurysm at the entrance of the thoracic to the abdominal aorta. The patient was hospitalized with the diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia and treated with IV Ceftriaxone plus Clindamycin and was discharged after 3 days. Two weeks later, the patient returned due to a decreased level of consciousness and increasing shortness of breath and was hospitalized and treated again with the diagnosis of pneumonia. Also, a pulmonary CT-angiography was performed which was negative for pulmonary thromboembolism. In both hospitalizations, due to an aortic aneurysm, it was recommended not to undergo HM in case of recurrent aspiration.
Type of complication |
Age | Gender | Choking on | Performer | Complain or sign (s) after HM |
History | Outcome | Final status | Year (Ref) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gastric Rupture |
74 | M | Food | Alert Companion | AbdominalDistention | Unknown | Laparotomy / splenectomy / 12days hospitalization | Discharged in goodcondition | 1975[10] |
39 | M | Food | Food Service Employee | None | CP / organic brain syndrome / epilepsy/ DM | None | Died | 1983[11] | |
74 | M | Meat | Family Members | Abdominal Discomfort | Parkinson’s disease | Laparotomy | Survived | 1987[12] | |
76 | F | Food | Nurse | AP Radiated toLeft Shoulder | MDD | Laparotomy / ICU admission/ Ventilation afterbronchopneumonia | Died | [13] | |
93 |
M |
Food |
Untrained But Well- Meaning Bystanders | Abdominal Dis-tention | Unknown |
Laparotomy / 66 dayshospitalization | Survived |
1993[14] | |
Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Pulmonary & Abdominal Symptoms | Unknown | Laparotomy | Died | 1996[15] | |
Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Pulmonary & Abdominal Symptoms | Unknown | Laparotomy | Discharged withgood condition | 1996[15] | |
57 | F | Pizza | Unknown | Vomited Blood | Unknown | Laparotomy / myocardial infarction / bronchopneumonia / 16 days hospitalization | Died | 1998[16] | |
74 | F | Meat | Bystander | AP & Distention | Unknown | Laparotomy | Discharged withoutany complications | 2002[17] | |
Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Laparoscopic surgery | Discharged withoutany complications | 2003[18] | |
59 | F | Unknown | EMT | Unknown | Nasopharyngeal cancer | Unsuccessful HM / CPR & endotracheal intubation / laparotomy | Survived | 2012[19] | |
Abdominal Aortic Thrombosis |
62 |
M |
Chicken |
Patients’Wife | Agonizing Pain & Weakness of The Lower Extremities | no history of atherosclerotic disease or clotting disorder | acute RF/ perforated ischemic colon | Died after operation | 1983[20] |
69 |
M |
Meat |
Untrained Companion | Unable to Move his Legs | AA |
Laparotomy / ICU admission/ massive complications of revascularization-reperfusion syndrome | Died |
1985[21] | |
70 |
M |
Meat |
Female Patron | Numbness & Paralysisof both Legs | CABG / renal insufficiency / popliteal bypass-graft | Fasciotomies after unsuccessfulembolectomy & instillation of urokinase / amputation / 4 weeks hospitalization | Discharged with RF |
2002[22] | |
80 | F | Prune | Unknown | Abdominal Discomfort | AAA | Massive systemic reperfusioninjury after operation | Died | 2002[23] | |
|
84 |
M |
Food |
Home Nursery | Femoral Pulse Was Absent / Mottling of The Foot | Unknown |
Massive ischemia-reperfusioninjury & RF after operation | Died |
2002[23] |
63 | M | Food | Bystander | Mild Abdominal Discomfort | Infrarenal AAA | type I, endoleak / aortic stent- graft displacement | Survived | 2003[24] | |
81 |
M |
Unknown | Unknown |
LBP/ LoS & Absent Pulses in The Lower Extremities | COPD / lower extremity DVT/ HTN / infra-renal AAA / left hip replacement | Mechanical ventilation |
Died after multiorgan system failure | 2007[25] | |
78 | F | Food | Nurse | Respiratory Arrest | Schizophrenia / hypothyroidism | Laparotomy | Died | 2008[26] | |
Aortic ValveRupture/ Aortic Dissection |
86 | M | Food | Untrained Companion | Severe SoB | Mild aortic insufficiency | Refused any invasive procedure | Survived but 3weeks later died | 1983[27] |
74 | F | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Aortic valve prosthesis | None | Survived | 1987[28] | |
85 | M | Bread | Unknown | Unconscious | Alzheimer-type dementia / HTN / hypercholesterolemia | Revealed in autopsy | Died | 2018[29] | |
67 | M | Meat | Emergency Medical Technician | Left-SidedHemiplegia | None | Thrombolytic therapy / TPA injection / surgical repair | Discharged withoutcomplications | 2019[30] | |
Pneumome- diastinum / Pneumotho- rax |
10 |
M |
Water |
Unknown |
Vomiting |
Epilepsy |
CPR / intubation / bacteremia |
Discharged in vegetative state and died 7 years later | 1987[31] |
3 |
M |
Thought To Be a Toy | Patients’Father | "Funny" Sensa- tion in The Back of Throat | None |
Gastrograffinswallow / esophagoscopy / bronchoscopy / foreign body had not been recovered | Discharged after 24hours observation | 1989[32] | |
7 | M | Pen | Patients’ Mother / Physician | Retrosternal Chest Pain | None | Topical & general anesthesia/ nasoendoscopy/ | Discharged with unremarkable recovery | 1998[33] | |
45 | F | Bony Chicken Meat | Caretakernurse | Emphysema | Mental illness | Pharyngoesophagoscopy | Survived | 2015[34] | |
Esophageal Rupture |
61 |
F |
Meat |
Patients’Husband | Dyspnea & Severe Pain in LUQ Radiated to Left Shoulder | None |
Gastrograffinswallow / Surgery / CPR/ ventilation / 83 days hospitalization | Survived |
1984[35] |
62 | M | Food | Patients’Nephew | Chest Pain & Respiratory Distress | Unknown | Surgery / 16 days hospitalization | Survived | 1986[36] | |
26 | M | Unknown | Unknown | Neck Swelling &Dyspnea, | None | None | Survived | 1996[37] | |
16 |
M |
Rice |
Patients’Mother |
Throat Pain, Odynophagia, Secretion Intolerance, Muffled Voice & Neck Stiffness | None |
Transcervical incision |
Discharged in goodcondition |
2018[38] |
|
Diaphrag- matic Rupture / Hernia |
±60 | M | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Mental Illness | None | Died | 1984[39] |
10 | F | Mucus Plug | Patients’Sister | Upper AP &Vomiting | Unknown | Laparotomy | Survived | 2013[40] | |
85 | F | Food | Nurse | Dyspnea And Dysphagia | Unknown | Laparotomy / septic shock / 50 days hospitalization | Discharged with slowly recovering | 2018[41] | |
|
85 | F | MedicalStaff | Piece of Meat | Dyspnea& Pleuritic ChestPain | Unknown | Laparotomy | Survived | 2018[42] |
HepaticRupture |
88 | M | Unknown | Piece of Meat | AP | Unknown | Medical therapy | Survived | 2007[43] |
84 | M | Bystand- er | Unknown | None | Unknown | Unsuccessful HM, CRP,Intubation, bronchoscopy | Survived | 2015[44] | |
Pancreatic Transection |
11 | M | Nothing | Patients’Father | Severe Upper AP | None | Laparotomy with distal pancreatectomy and splenic salvage | Discharged in goodcondition | 2007[45] |
3 | M | Unknown | Piece of Cantaloupe | AP, Weight Loss | None | None | Survived | 2009[46] | |
MesentericLaceration | 76 | M | Aspirin | Patients’ Son | Abdominal & Leg Pain & Dyspnea | Unknown | None | Died | 1986[47] |
Jejunum Rupture | 22 | M | Wood | Alert Atten- dant | PersistentVomiting | Mental Illness | Laparotomy | Survived | 1986[48] |
Splenic Rupture | 83 | M | Meat | Nurse | Unconscious & collapsed | Unknown | CPR | Died | 2011[49] |
Cholesterol Embolization & Arterial Occlusion | 56 | F | Meat | Bystander | Right Foot Pain | Unknown | CT Angiography / Heparin infusion | Discharged with Apixaban as oral treatment | 2021[50] |
Myocardial Injury | 53 | M | Noodle | Security Guard | Upper Abdominal Discomfort | HTN | Cardiac Arrest | Died | 2022[51] |
Rotator CuffTear | 48 | M | Unknown | Fellow Restaurant Diner | Shoulder Pain | Unknown | Arthroscopy / UneventfulRecovery | Survived | 2010[52] |
Thoracic Vertebral Compression Fractures | 80 |
F |
Unknown |
Untrained Person | LBPWith Muscle Spasm | Osteoporotic ThoracicVertebral Fractures | Kyphoplasty |
Survived |
2010[53] |
Male: M; Female: F; Low Back Pain: LBP; Loss of Sensation: LoS; Cerebral Palsy: CP; Aortic Aneurysm: AA; Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: AAA; Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: CABG; Renal Failure: RF; Diabetes Mellites: DM; Deep Venous Thrombosis: DVT; Tissue Plasminogen Activator: TPA; Emergency Medical Technician: EMT; Shortness of Breath: SoB; Left Upper Quadrant: LUQ; AP: AP; Major Depressive Disorder: MDD; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: CPR; Heimlich Maneuver: HM; Intensive Care Unit: ICU; Hypertension: HTN.
HM has saved the lives of many choking victims [4], but significant cases of post-HM complications have been published so far. The experience and level of training of the person performing HM, the number of times HM is performed, the presence of comorbidity in the victim, and age have a significant role in the occurrence of these complications. In this section, we give a review of each of the complications listed in the Table, and at the end, we discuss the proposed solutions that can be used to prevent them.
1- Gastric rupture (11 cases)
2- Abdominal aortic thrombosis (8 cases)
3- Aortic Valve Rupture / Aortic Dissection (4 cases)
4- Pneumomediastinum / Pneumothorax (4 cases)
5- Esophageal rupture (4 cases)
6- Diaphragmatic Rupture / Hernia (4 cases)
7- Hepatic Rupture (2 cases)
8- Pancreatic Transection (2 cases)
9- Other complications such as mesenteric laceration, jejunum rupture, splenic rupture, cholesterol embolization and arterial occlusion, myocardial injury, rotator cuff tear, and thoracic vertebral fractures (once each).
As shown in the Table 1, many of the HM performers did not have enough experience and training in this area and were among the bystanders present at the accident site. Ichikawa [5] showed that consecutive HMs can be associated with complications, and supine and prone positions are more efficient than standing. Comorbidity also played a role in the occurrence of some complications, for instance, several patients with abdominal aortic thrombosis had aortic aneurysm, a patient with myocardial injury had hypertension and a patient with thoracic vertebral fracture had osteoporosis. Also, in some patients with neuropsychiatric disorders such as cerebral palsy, dementia, and schizophrenia, the lack of proper evacuation of the foreign body after HM leads to consecutive HMs and, as a result, can increase the possibility of complications. Also, most of the patients who developed complications after HM were adults and were over 60 years old. Various techniques such as back blows, chest thrusts/compressions, and manual removal of obstructions from the mouth are recommended by ARC other than HM [6]. To the best of our knowledge, both the Red Cross and the National Health Service (NHS) have recommended HM to be performed as the third step in the approach to choking victims, so that in the first step, the victim should be encouraged to evacuate the foreign body by coughing, and in the second step, 5 strong blows should be given between the scapulas of the victim, if these two steps failed, then HM should be performed [7]. In 2016 the Australian and New Zealand Committee on Resuscitation (ANZCOR) recommended back blows and chest thrusts instead of HM [8]. Another technique is the Table Maneuver which was introduced by Blain et al. in 2010 [9], in which the choking victim lies on the table with his face and hands hanging from it, and the performer gives sharp blows between the scapulas with the heel of the hand. This technique can be performed on all age groups and patients in cases where there is more doubt that HM is associated with complications.
Especially in elderly patients, those who have underlying diseases such as aortic aneurysms or clotting disorders, and patients with neuropsychiatric illnesses such as cerebral palsy or dementia, the HM should be performed correctly and not with too much pressure to the abdomen to reduce the risk of complications and even without complaints, this group of patients should subsequently be transferred to the hospital so that further assessments can be performed in a shorter time if there are any complications. It is also recommended that all patients undergoing HM should immediately be taken to the hospital if they have complaints such as abdominal distention or discomfort, dyspnea, chest pain or neck stiffness, foot pain, and pulseless or paralytic lower extremities after HM has been performed.
Patient consent: An informed consent was taken from the patient’s family for the publication of this case report.